Alexandre read Ronald’s notes. He wrote that Plato, Aristotle, and Kant answered the same question in contradictory ways. Their views could not be reconciled. Kant vision was the root cause of human problems.
He explained that you need to think to survive and, because you think with concepts, epistemology studies how you form them. Valid concepts hold percepts, perceptions of real things. Invalid concepts hold fancepts, perceptions of fantasies. People often use the same words but give them different meanings. The consequence was uncommunication. Confucius saw this problem and wanted to reform language.
Epistemology felt intimidating at first, but its treasure slowly revealed itself. Alexandre felt the excitement for the coming meeting.
During training one day, a tall stranger watched. He approached Alexandre at the exit.
“They said you’re Alexandre. I’m Boris Petrov. Investigating Ronald’s accident,” the man said, extending a hand.
“Do you know these men?” Boris asked, showing a photo of Franco Gambino and another man near the Louvre’s glass pyramid.
“He owns the club,” Alexandre said, pointing to Gambino. “I don’t know the other.”
“You don’t know Lenel Anston?”
“No. Are you police?”
“No. I investigate independently. Remember anything before Ronald’s death?”
“No. Do you know where his car is?” Alexander asked.
“I’m looking. Why?”
“I need discretion,” Alexandre said and thought, Perhaps this is my chance to avenge Ronald. “Don’t give me data on the phone, but write my number. Call me if you find his car. Information in person only.”
“OK,” Boris nodded.
“I think someone caused the accident,” Alexandre said lowering his voice and looking both sides.
“I suspect the same,” Boris responded. “I’ll call you. Here’s my card. Anything strange before Ronald died?”
“He called the day before. Warned me about what ‘reads the same in both directions.’ I don’t know what he meant.”
49